We are not obligated to do anything for IPv6 day, but.... They're planning on doing it anyway. Since they are planning on changing the edge and the core as well as many routers. My feeling is we might as well try it. I 'm going to suggest we just change our outward facing machines (ie login.ci, login.tp, login.pads, login.beagle, www.ci... etc) So, what are the group's thoughts? i already know Robert has serious concerns about how disruptive IPv6 might be to us. Specific concerns? Do you think I'm crazy? Do you think I'm crazy specifically because of this IPv6 thing? David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I do not plan on dropping v6 on any of MCS' production networks without careful study and testbed work. With the way that hosts treat ipv6 it is dangerous to roll it out without testing to see how clients, servers as well as appliances like printers and NAS devices behave. - -corby On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:57 PM, David Forero wrote:
We are not obligated to do anything for IPv6 day, but....
They're planning on doing it anyway. Since they are planning on changing the edge and the core as well as many routers. My feeling is we might as well try it.
I 'm going to suggest we just change our outward facing machines (ie login.ci, login.tp, login.pads, login.beagle, www.ci... etc)
So, what are the group's thoughts? i already know Robert has serious concerns about how disruptive IPv6 might be to us.
Specific concerns?
Do you think I'm crazy?
Do you think I'm crazy specifically because of this IPv6 thing?
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNqIncQhpwH3ALVFERAk9KAJ9BsNrpMkK9gVe6kg3cpsmuOxNpnACgxjGF 75bikIocIh2FJ7NU71s02ds= =vZed -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
David Forero -
Schmitz Corby