Re: [mpich-devel] [mpich-discuss] Use of Signed-off-by in MPICH
5 Jan
2014
5 Jan
'14
1:24 p.m.
On Jan 5, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
Essentially, it’s what we define it to be. I guess we could have used “Reviewed-by”, but I’m not sure it really matters that much.
FWIW, I think it's a needless deviation from a widespread convention.
I’ll bring this up at the next group meeting and see what the other developers think. — Pavan -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
4583
Age (days ago)
4583
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Pavan Balaji