Re: [mpich-devel] [mpich-discuss] Use of Signed-off-by in MPICH
In our group meeting we decided to keep using the Signed-off-by field, as it's more convenient for us. This has been clarified in our wiki page on the workflow section: https://wiki.mpich.org/mpich/index.php/Git#Overall_Workflow Thank you for bringing our attention to this. Toni On 01/05/2014 01:24 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
On Jan 5, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
Essentially, it�s what we define it to be. I guess we could have used �Reviewed-by�, but I�m not sure it really matters that much. FWIW, I think it's a needless deviation from a widespread convention. I�ll bring this up at the next group meeting and see what the other developers think.
� Pavan
-- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
-- Antonio J. Pe�a Postdoctoral Appointee Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue, Bldg. 240, Of. 3148 Argonne, IL 60439-4847 [email protected] www.mcs.anl.gov/~apenya
participants (1)
-
"Antonio J. Peña"