Hello, Wesley.I think my previous mail was not clear enough.
The system has following processes:After some execution time, code of Application (Main) calls "abort()" function and fails without sending SIG_TERM to mpiexec.hydra process.
- Application (Main) - this process executes:
execvp with parameters mpiexec.hydra -genvall -disable-auto-cleanup
-f MpiConfigMachines.txt -launcher=ssh -n 3 MPI_Prog- MPI_Prog - this program performs calculations. It's instances (processes) created by mpiexec.hydra.
I understand that this is a bug. It will be fixed by Application developers.
But, after wrong Application termination mpiexec.hydra's father becomes init process. This is ok.
But then I see via netstat that mpiexec.hydra starts sockets with other process (called Controller), which was not part of MPI execution.
Is hydra tries to establish/restore connection with it's father (killed Application) process.
I understand that this is an emergency and unexpected mpiexec.hydra usage.
I was sure that mpiexec.hydra will not respond to Application fail and will behave exactly like Application process still exist.
May be you can explain this strange situation.
Regards,Anatoly.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Wesley Bland <wbland@anl.gov> wrote:
_______________________________________________When you pass
-disable-auto-cleanupon the command line to mpiexec, you’re telling Hydra not to clean up other processes when one process in your job fails. It’s assumed that those processes will either clean themselves up or complete successfully.It’s not clear to me what your program is trying to do that would be erroneous, but usually when a process crashes, it’s the result of an erroneous program rather than a bug in MPICH. I’m not saying that there’s no bugs in MPICH, but we’d like to be able to narrow down where to look.
Thanks,
Wesley
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Anatoly G <anatolyrishon@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear MPICH.I have an additional information.This "strange configuration" (hydra connected to computer not from the list) is result of unhandled Main process fail (similar to abort() call) without killing children process (hydra).Thus I can see "init" process becomes a father of hydra process.Can you please refer me to document explaining hydra behavior when father process is dead (an emergency situation).I understand that this situation shouldn't happen and this bug will be fixed, but I'm curious about the hydra logic.
Regards,Anatoly.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anatoly G <anatolyrishon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 1:00 PM
Subject: mpiexec.hydra creates unexpectable TCP socket.
To: discuss@mpich.org
Dear MPICH.I'm using mpich 3.1 (hydra+MPI).I execute main application (Main) which calls mpiexec.hydra in following way:
mpiexec.hydra -genvall -disable-auto-cleanup -f MpiConfigMachines.txt -launcher=ssh -n 3 MPI_Prog
MpiConfigMachines.txt content:
Where 10.3.2.100 is a local host.As result I get
- Main + single MPI_Prog processes on local computer
- 2 MPI_Prog processes on remote one.
Main application establish TCP socket with local MPI_Prog.Main application establish TCP socket with controller on other computer 10.3.2.170, which is not included in MpiConfigMachines.txt file.
After executing some time (hours, sometimes days) I see via netstat that created new connection from mpiexec.hydra and controller.
Before executing mpiexec.hydra I set environment variablesetenv MPIEXEC_PORT_RANGE 50010:65535
According to manual this variable limits hydra destination ports to [50010:65535].
I see that hydra uses these ports with MPI_Prog, but connection with controller done on port 701 (controller computer).
Controller program is a server. It can accept connections only.
Can you please advice how to stand with this problem?
How hydra recognizes controller IP and establish connection with it?
Sincerely,
Anatoly.
discuss mailing list discuss@mpich.org
To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss