Hi Ron,
Depending on how the algorithm is structured, I may well be that the faster computers are generating messages faster than the slow computer is able to process them. As the problem size increases, the amount of data in unprocessed messages may get too high for that computer. In a very simple example (but note that there are many other possible situations):
Hosts A and B:
for(int i=0; i<n; i++) {
MPI_Send(buf, count, MPI_INT, host_c, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
buf += count;
}
Host C:
for(int i=0; i<2*n; i++) {
MPI_Recv(buf, count, MPI_INT, MPI_ANY_SOURCE, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &status);
process_data(buf);
}
In that case the senders keep sending data to host_c faster than it's calling MPI_Recv, and get received by MPICH as unexpected messages (MPICH doesn't know where to place that data, and uses temporary internal buffers). Note that this situation is not necessarily caused by different processing speeds, since the culprit may well be the used algorithm itself. A very simple solution to avoid the prior potential problem could be:
Host A and B:
MPI_Barrier(MPI_COMM_WORLD);
for(int i=0; i<n; i++) {
MPI_Send(buf, count, MPI_INT, host_c, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
buf += n;
}
Host C:
for(int i=0; i<2*n; i++) {
MPI_Irecv(buf, count, MPI_INT, MPI_ANY_SOURCE, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &requests[i]);
buf += count;
}
MPI_Barrier(MPI_COMM_WORLD);
for(int i=0; i<2*n; i++) {
MPI_Waitany(2*n, requests, &idx, &status);
process_data(buf+idx*count);
}
Now the data is placed on its final destination, since it's guaranteed that the MPI implementation knows its destination before receiving it. That solution would assume that there is enough memory for preallocating all receiving buffers, which may not be true and may require, for example, implementing a high-level protocol (such as based on credits) to synchronize the sends and receives to make sure that there is room on the receiver for them.
I hope this helps.
Best,
Antonio
On 05/24/2014 02:00 AM, Ron Palmer wrote:
Antonio, Rajeev and others,
thanks for your replies and comments on possible causes for the error messages and failure, I have passed them on to the programmers of the underlying application. I must admit I do not understand what unexpected messages are (I am but a mere user), could you perhaps give examples of typical causes of them? Eg, the cluster it runs on consists of 3 dual xeon computers with varying cpu clock rating - could these error messages be due to getting out of synch, expecting results but not getting them from the slower computer? I have re-started the process but excluded the slowest computer (2.27GHz, the other two are running at 2.87 and 3.2) as I was running out of ideas.
For your information, this runs well on smaller problems (few computations).
Thanks,
Ron
On 24/05/2014 3:10 AM, Rajeev Thakur wrote:
Yes. The message below says some process has received 261,895 messages for which no matching receives have been posted yet.
Rajeev
It looks like at least one of your processes is receiving too many unexpected messages, leading to get out of memory. Unexpected messages are those not matching a posted receive on the receiver side. You may check with the application developers to make them review the algorithm or look for any possible bug.
Antonio
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- Antonio J. Peña Postdoctoral Appointee Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue, Bldg. 240, Of. 3148 Argonne, IL 60439-4847 apenya@mcs.anl.gov www.mcs.anl.gov/~apenya
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss