No, these failures don't occur all the time. I have a successful run (with my original implementation) which I am using as the base case for comparison.

On 16 January 2014 16:11, Balaji, Pavan <balaji@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Luiz Carlos da Costa Junior <lcjunior@ufrj.br> wrote:
> However, I noticed that the execution times were much higher than the cases in which the failure didn't occur.
> Is there any reason, apart from some implementation mistake, to explain this behavior?

What are the two cases you are comparing? Are you against comparing process failures?

— Pavan

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list discuss@mpich.org
To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss