Hi,
Pavan Balaji <balaji@mcs.anl.gov> writes:On 12/24/2012 10:41 AM US Central Time, Angel de Vicente wrote:
Pavan Balaji <balaji@mcs.anl.gov> writes:There should not be any difference in which MPI is used for anyhigh-level library. Did you try running MPICH with simpler programs?
Does that work correctly?yes, MPICH2 for simpler problems is working OK. Actually it is workingOK for my own developed version of our code with MPI. But when usingParamesh it is totally broken. I haven't looked under the hood to try to
find what could be causing these problems, so I was hoping perhaps therewas someone reading this list who had already tried it and had some ideaof what was wrong.I'm going to be using Paramesh extensively during the coming months, so
I might end up looking into the details myself, but any help will beappreciated.Sorry, we haven't played with Paramesh. Did you try contacting the
paramesh folks?
due to lack of funding, support for Paramesh was dropped in 2008...
--
Ángel de Vicente
http://www.iac.es/galeria/angelv/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADVERTENCIA: Sobre la privacidad y cumplimiento de la Ley de ProtecciÛn de Datos, acceda a http://www.iac.es/disclaimer.php
WARNING: For more information on privacy and fulfilment of the Law concerning the Protection of Data, consult http://www.iac.es/disclaimer.php?lang=en
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list discuss@mpich.org
To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss