Hi Kurt:

Am 07.12.2019 um 16:07 schrieb Mccall, Kurt E. (MSFC-EV41) <[email protected]>:

Thanks Reuti. I assume that by the "task manager interface without ssh", you mean

$ mpiexec -launcher rsh ...

No. If the default compilation doesn't include SLURM support in your case, one has to compile MPICH with: $ ./configure --with-slurm=[PATH] … It should look like: $ ps -e f … 16594 ? Sl 0:00 slurmstepd: [166806.batch] 16599 ? S 0:00 \_ /bin/bash /var/spool/slurm/d/job166806/slurm_script 16755 ? S 0:00 \_ mpiexec ./mpihello 16757 ? Ssl 0:00 \_ /bin/srun -N 2 -n 2 --input none /home/reuti/local/mpich-3.3.2/bin/hydra_pmi_pro 16758 ? S 0:00 \_ /bin/srun -N 2 -n 2 --input none /home/reuti/local/mpich-3.3.2/bin/hydra_pmi 16766 ? Sl 0:00 slurmstepd: [166806.0] 16772 ? S 0:00 \_ /home/reuti/local/mpich-3.3.2/bin/hydra_pmi_proxy --control-port node045:3 16773 ? Rs 0:09 \_ ./mpihello 16774 ? Rs 0:09 \_ ./mpihello … (and on the slave nodes only the second daemon is present) No SSH, no RSH. Hence it's a tight integration into the queuing system. https://slurm.schedmd.com/mpi_guide.html In addition, to change to `srun` as startup one might need (not used in the example above): https://wiki.mpich.org/mpich/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Note_that_.... It should work with a cluster which has no `ssh` to the nodes implemented at all (I allow `ssh` to the nodes only for admin staff). === Are the nodes on a private network, i.e. the nodes can't be reached from the Internet? Then one might also discuss pro and cons of allowing `rsh` or not. If even inside a private cluster all communication between the nodes has to be encrypted, I fear neither MPICH nor any other MPI implementation provides this. === AFAIR "fork" was used in times before Hydra as an alternative to start the MPI tasks local on a single machine only. I didn't check for "fork" or "smpd" for some time since Hydra appeared. -- Reuti

I can't use rsh on our cluster due to security concerns. Another launcher option is "fork", but when I tried it, the whole job froze. Does "fork" refer to a specific binary like ssh, or does it refer to the Linux system call?

Thanks, Kurt

...

...

Sorry, I forgot to mention that I am starting the job under PBS/Torque with the qsub command.

...

Then it should be possible to use the task manager interface without `ssh`:

-----Original Message----- From: Reuti via discuss <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 9:02 AM To: Mccall, Kurt E. (MSFC-EV41) via discuss <[email protected]> Cc: Reuti <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: too many ssh connections warning

Hi:

...

Am 03.12.2019 um 15:45 schrieb Mccall, Kurt E. (MSFC-EV41) via discuss <[email protected]>:

Reuti,

Sorry, I forgot to mention that I am starting the job under PBS/Torque with the qsub command.

Then it should be possible to use the task manager interface without `ssh`:

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__docs.adaptivecomputing.c...

...

I'll check with our sysadmins to see if there are firewall issues.

This could also be later an issue if MPICH will connect to other machines directly to talk to the already started daemons.

...

What is PAM?

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_L...

Several limits can be set here, depending on your distribution:

ls /lib64/security/

will show the available ones which are installed by default and are then used/configured in /etc/pam.d

-- Reuti

...

Hui Zhou,

What do you expect would be making multiple SSH connections to the node? The creation of inter-communicators? Individual MPI_Iprobe/MPI_Isend/MPI_IRecv commands? If you have a guess, that would help me know how to fix the problem.

Kurt

-----Original Message----- From: Reuti <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 2, 2019 3:20 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Mccall, Kurt E. (MSFC-EV41) <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [mpich-discuss] too many ssh connections warning

...

Am 02.12.2019 um 22:14 schrieb Mccall, Kurt E. (MSFC-EV41) via discuss <[email protected]>:

My application uses mainly inter-communicators rather than intra-communicators for fault tolerance. A particular process might have 20 inter-communicators active at one time. I’m receiving the warning

[[email protected]] WARNING: too many ssh connections to n009.cluster.com; waiting 6 seconds

What is the cause of this? I have several guesses:

1) MPICH has an internal limit on the number of connections 2) I’m bumping up against a Linux limit on the number of connections 3) Non-blocking communication using MPI_Isend() creates a temporary ssh connection (not likely)

4) Firewall or PAM settings on the target prevent to many logins in a certain timeframe.

Are you using a queuing system and have the chance to skip SSH and startup MPICH by the queuing system?

-- Reuti

...

The other question is, what are the consequences of “waiting 6 seconds”? Are some non-blocking messages dropped?

I’m using MPICH 3.3.2, CentOS 3.10 and the Portland Group compiler pgc++ 19.5.0.

_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.mpich.org_mailman...

_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.mpich.org_mailman...

_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.mpich.org_mailman...