Re: [mpich-discuss] Crash on MPI_Rput
Hi Bruce, Is the test suite available for us to checkout and test? -- Hui ________________________________ From: Palmer, Bruce J via discuss <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2022 4:03 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer, Bruce J <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Crash on MPI_Rput I kind of dropped this for a while but I’d like to pick it back up. I did some more testing using different versions of mpich and got the following results for the RMA runtime MPICH-3.1.4 configured with ./configure --prefix=/people/d3g293/mpich/mpich-3.1.4/install --with-libfabric=embedded --enable-threads=multiple --with-slurm CC=gcc CXX=g++ 2/80 tests fail in GA test suite MPICH-4.0.2 configured with unset F90 ./configure --prefix=/people/d3g293/mpich/mpich-4.0.2/install --with-device=ch4:ofi:sockets --with-libfabric=embedded --enable-threads=multiple --with-slurm CC=gcc CXX=g++ 25/80 tests fail in GA test suite Running with MPICH-3.3.2 seems to lead to around 8 failures, but my notes on this aren’t that good. If I run with OpenMPI 4.1.4, everything passes. Any reason for why I’m seeing this? I haven’t really done much to this runtime in the last few years. Bruce From: Palmer, Bruce J via discuss <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 12:30 PM To: 'Thakur, Rajeev' <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Zhou, Hui <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer, Bruce J <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Crash on MPI_Rput Check twice before you click! This email originated from outside PNNL. I think the MPI-RMA runtime was mostly (maybe completely) working with 3.2-3.4. It may have even been working earlier with 4.0. I think there is a pretty good chance that the problem is a system configuration problem at our end and I was hoping that you might have some insight into what it might be based on the errors I’m seeing. I can try running with a few earlier versions of mpich and see if any of them work better. Bruce From: Thakur, Rajeev <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 12:24 PM To: [email protected]; Zhou, Hui <[email protected]> Cc: Palmer, Bruce J <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Crash on MPI_Rput Was it working with an earlier version of MPICH? If so, which one? Rajeev From: "Palmer, Bruce J via discuss" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:20 PM To: "Zhou, Hui" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "Palmer, Bruce J" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Crash on MPI_Rput I upgraded to mpich-4.0.2 (latest stable release) and get pretty much the same result. This failure is reproducible, I get the same error on multiple runs so it doesn’t look like an unexpected process failure. One other feature that I forgot to mention earlier is that I’m running this test on 4 processors distributed over 2 nodes. If I run 4 processes on 1 node, the code runs without error. Bruce From: Zhou, Hui <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 2:55 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Palmer, Bruce J <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Crash on MPI_Rput Hi Bruce, * srun: error: node003: task 1: Exited with exit code 7 Looks like one of the process crashed unexpectedly. -- Hui Zhou From: Palmer, Bruce J via discuss <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 3:32 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Palmer, Bruce J <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [mpich-discuss] Crash on MPI_Rput Hi, I’m testing the MPI-RMA runtime in Global Arrays and I’m getting a lot more crashes than I’ve seen in the past. The MPI-RMA runtime code is fairly stable and hasn’t been modified much recently and all the tests used to pass using one of the more recent MPICH releases. However, I’m getting significant crashes at this point. One of them occurs in a program designed to test non-blocking communication. It creates an MPI window, using MPI_Alloc_mem followed by MPI_Win_create and then calls MPI_Win_lock_all on the window. The code currently crashes when it gets to an MPI_Rput call. I’m trying to see if there is something different in the environment that might be causing this. I’m currently up to MPICH-4.0b1 configured with ./configure --prefix=/people/d3g293/mpich/mpich-4.0b1/install --with-device=ch4:ofi:sockets --with-libfabric=embedded --enable-threads=multiple --with-slurm CC=gcc CXX=g++ #./configure --prefix=/people/d3g293/mpich/mpich-3.4.1/install-newell-nocuda --with-device=ch4:ofi:sockets --with-libfabric=embedded --enable-threads=multiple --with-slurm CC=gcc CXX=g++ I’ve tried other recent vintages of MPICH, but I get similar results. The error I’m seeing when the program crashes is [proxy:0:[email protected]] HYD_pmcd_pmip_control_cmd_cb (pm/pmiserv/pmip_cb.c:899): assert (!closed) failed [proxy:0:[email protected]] HYDT_dmxu_poll_wait_for_event (tools/demux/demux_poll.c:76): callback returned error status srun: error: node003: task 1: Exited with exit code 7 [proxy:0:[email protected]] main (pm/pmiserv/pmip.c:169): demux engine error waiting for event [[email protected]] HYDT_bscu_wait_for_completion (tools/bootstrap/utils/bscu_wait.c:74): one of the processes terminated badly; aborting [[email protected]] HYDT_bsci_wait_for_completion (tools/bootstrap/src/bsci_wait.c:21): launcher returned error waiting for completion [[email protected]] HYD_pmci_wait_for_completion (pm/pmiserv/pmiserv_pmci.c:179): launcher returned error waiting for completion [[email protected]] main (ui/mpich/mpiexec.c:325): process manager error waiting for completion Any suggestions about what might be going wrong here? It could be a problem with the machine configuration, since this code seemed to be running fine a while ago and has not been modified since then. I’ll try building the latest stable release and see if that fixes anything, but as I mentioned none of the recent releases seems to work. Bruce Palmer Computer Scientist Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (509) 375-3899
participants (1)
-
Zhou, Hui