Re: [mpich-discuss] Semantics of MPI_Cancel
7 Aug
2013
7 Aug
'13
4:10 p.m.
You canceled the recv, not the send. The send will still go through and match the first available receive that can be matched. On Aug 7, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Matthieu Dorier wrote:
Hi,
Suppose process 0 does the following MPI_Irecv(...req) MPI_Cancel(req) MPI_Recv
and process 1 does MPI_Send MPI_Send
Does process 0 receives the data from the first or the second MPI_Send? (I'd tend to say the second, but I'd like a confirmation).
Thanks!
Matthieu Dorier PhD student at ENS Cachan Brittany and IRISA http://people.irisa.fr/Matthieu.Dorier _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
4732
Age (days ago)
4732
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Rajeev Thakur