Re: [mpich-discuss] osu_latency test: why 8KB takes less time than 4KB and 2KB takes less time than 1KB?
Is the ethernet connection a single dedicated cable between the two machines or are you running through a switch that handles other traffic? My best guess is that this is noise and that you may be able to avoid it by running a very long time, e.g. 10000 iterations. Jeff On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Abu Naser <[email protected]> wrote:
Good day to all,
I had run point to point osu_latency test in two nodes for 200 times. Followings are the average time in microsecond for various size of the messages -
1KB 84.8514 us 2KB 73.52535 us 4KB 272.55275 us 8KB 234.86385 us 16KB 288.88 us 32KB 523.3725 us 64KB 910.4025 us
From the above looks like, 2KB message has less latency than 1 KB and 8KB has less latency than 4KB.
I was looking for explanation of this behavior but did not get any.
1. MPIR_CVAR_CH3_EAGER_MAX_MSG_SIZE is set to 128KB. So none of the above message size is using Rendezvous protocol. Is there any partition inside eager protocol (e.g. 0 - 512 bytes, 1KB - 8KB, 16KB - 64KB)? If yes then what are the boundaries for them? Can I log them with debug-event-logging?
Setup I am using:
- two nodes has intel core i7, one with 16gb memory another one 8gb
- mpich 3.2.1, configured and build to use nemesis tcp
- 1gb Ethernet connection
- NFS is using for sharing
- osu_latency : uses MPI_Send and MPI_Recv
- MPIR_CVAR_CH3_EAGER_MAX_MSG_SIZE= 131072 (128KB)
Can anyone help me on that? Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Abu Naser
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- Jeff Hammond [email protected] http://jeffhammond.github.io/ _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
participants (1)
-
Jeff Hammond