Re: [mpich-discuss] Incorrect error checking?
Nick, I agree this check looks like nonsense. IMO, we can just delete it and the others like it. I will create a PR. Ken On 6/18/19 5:25 PM, Nick Radcliffe via discuss wrote:
I recently noticed that a parameter check in MPII_Win_get_attr looks a bit off:
/* A common user error is to pass the address of a 4-byte * int when the address of a pointer (or an address-sized int) * should have been used. We can test for this specific * case. Note that this code assumes sizeof(intptr_t) is * a power of 2. */ if ((intptr_t) attribute_val & (sizeof(intptr_t) - 1)) { MPIR_ERR_SETANDSTMT(mpi_errno, MPI_ERR_ARG, goto fn_fail, "**attrnotptr"); }
The comment indicates that the check is testing "attribute_val" to see if a pointer to int was passed in, rather than a double pointer or pointer to an integer that can store an address. But the check seems to only be testing for 8 byte alignment (and failing if not aligned). Am I missing something here?
Nick Radcliffe Software Engineer| Cray Inc.
2131 Lindau Ln #1000 | Bloomington, MN55425
+1-651-605-8864 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.cray.com <http://www.cray.com>
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
participants (1)
-
Raffenetti, Kenneth J.