July 2012 - mpi-forum - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Mpi-forum] Registration for the meeting next week
by Jeff Hammond 13 Jul '12

13 Jul '12

I don't know if I'm incredibly stupid or there's something wrong with the registration site, but it took me 7 times to get my registration to go through. The first six times I tried to complete the process, it just kicked me back to the payment info page and cleared all the forms. If no one else had problems, perhaps my karma is in a bad state because of my C++ tantrums. Jeff On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Richard Graham <richardg(a)mellanox.com> wrote: > For those of you that have not yet registered, and plan to attend next week, > please do so ASAP so that we have a good number for catering. I am aware of > at least one person that plans to be at the meeting, and has not yet > registered ï¿½ do not know how many more may be in the same situation. > > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Hammond Argonne Leadership Computing Facility University of Chicago Computation Institute jhammond(a)alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond

1 0

Registration for the meeting next week
by Richard Graham 13 Jul '12

13 Jul '12

For those of you that have not yet registered, and plan to attend next week, please do so ASAP so that we have a good number for catering. I am aware of at least one person that plans to be at the meeting, and has not yet registered - do not know how many more may be in the same situation. Thanks, Rich

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] tickets regarding the datatype and environment chapters
by George Bosilca 13 Jul '12

13 Jul '12

Adam, Here is the list of tickets applied to the datatype and environment chapters. 182: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/182 204: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/204 207: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/207 215: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/215 255: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/255 263: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/263 265: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/265 266: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/266 280: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/280 Thanks, george. On Jul 12, 2012, at 21:25 , Adam T. Moody wrote: > Hi George, > Can you pass along the list of ticket numbers that touched the chapter? > -Adam > > George Bosilca wrote: > >> All passed tickets regarding the datatype and environment chapters have been applied in the approved branch. Please check and let me know if anything went wrong. >> >> Thanks, >> george. >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard
by Rolf Rabenseifner 13 Jul '12

13 Jul '12

Dear all, when you comment on tickets and use page and line numbers from this document, I recommend to add the following text to your comments: Page numbers and lines in mpi-report_r1270.pdf send out in http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/07/1890.php Otherwise we get confused when we have the next draft and must look whether required changes are done or not done. Best regards Rolf ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Graham" <richardg(a)mellanox.com> > To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:16:59 PM > Subject: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard > Here is a version that people can start to look at – as was mentioned, > updates are still coming. > > > > Rich > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner(a)hlrs.de High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard
by Richard Graham 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

You should feel free to distribute to your team. Please send comments to chapter authors. Those are listed on a page linked to the mpi 3 page. Rich From: Supalov, Alexander [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:35 AM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard Hi Rich, Thanks. Great to see this document come together. Two questions: 1. I suppose we should keep this draft to ourselves for the time being, so I’m asking how strict this should be. I would rather involve some people on my team to review this or a later draft if this is not explicitly disallowed. 2. In case we do find something that appears to be incorrect, what is the right process to report the issue? I.e., ii/6 mentions C++ interface that has been removed AFAIK, and the rest of the text still contains the resp. C++ calls and such. Is this an issue, and if so, who will deal with it? Best regards. Alexander From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:17 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard Here is a version that people can start to look at – as was mentioned, updates are still coming. Rich Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer, Christian Lamprechter Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard
by Richard Graham 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

Yes From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:45 AM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Cc: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard Rich - You sent this private draft over a public mailing list that has web archives. Did you mean to do that? Sent from my phone. No type good. On Jul 12, 2012, at 1:35 PM, "Supalov, Alexander" <alexander.supalov(a)intel.com<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Rich, Thanks. Great to see this document come together. Two questions: 1. I suppose we should keep this draft to ourselves for the time being, so I’m asking how strict this should be. I would rather involve some people on my team to review this or a later draft if this is not explicitly disallowed. 2. In case we do find something that appears to be incorrect, what is the right process to report the issue? I.e., ii/6 mentions C++ interface that has been removed AFAIK, and the rest of the text still contains the resp. C++ calls and such. Is this an issue, and if so, who will deal with it? Best regards. Alexander From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:17 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard Here is a version that people can start to look at – as was mentioned, updates are still coming. Rich Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer, Christian Lamprechter Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052 _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] tickets regarding the datatype and environment chapters
by Adam T. Moody 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

Hi George, Can you pass along the list of ticket numbers that touched the chapter? -Adam George Bosilca wrote: >All passed tickets regarding the datatype and environment chapters have been applied in the approved branch. Please check and let me know if anything went wrong. > > Thanks, > george. >_______________________________________________ >mpi-forum mailing list >mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > >

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard
by David Solt 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

I'm a bit confused what is going on with the C++ interfaces. I e-mailed the ticket owners and added comments to the C++ removal ticket because the PDF posted on that ticket is full of dangling C++ references. There are places where it says "in C++ the interface is:" and then an empty space where the C++ definition was removed. There appears to be many places where the document refers to optional C++ arguments and other C++ specific API issues. Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong document because Doug says that they did look at each individual C++ reference and did not simply move all the C++ API's to the deleted interfaces chapter, but the pdf I looked at looked like it had a lot of work to go. Dave From: "Supalov, Alexander" <alexander.supalov(a)intel.com> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org> Date: 07/12/2012 12:39 PM Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard Sent by: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Hi Rich, Thanks. Great to see this document come together. Two questions: 1. I suppose we should keep this draft to ourselves for the time being, so I’m asking how strict this should be. I would rather involve some people on my team to review this or a later draft if this is not explicitly disallowed. 2. In case we do find something that appears to be incorrect, what is the right process to report the issue? I.e., ii/6 mentions C++ interface that has been removed AFAIK, and the rest of the text still contains the resp. C++ calls and such. Is this an issue, and if so, who will deal with it? Best regards. Alexander From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [ mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:17 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard Here is a version that people can start to look at – as was mentioned, updates are still coming. Rich Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer, Christian Lamprechter Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052 _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard
by Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

Rich - You sent this private draft over a public mailing list that has web archives. Did you mean to do that? Sent from my phone. No type good. On Jul 12, 2012, at 1:35 PM, "Supalov, Alexander" <alexander.supalov(a)intel.com<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Rich, Thanks. Great to see this document come together. Two questions: 1. I suppose we should keep this draft to ourselves for the time being, so I’m asking how strict this should be. I would rather involve some people on my team to review this or a later draft if this is not explicitly disallowed. 2. In case we do find something that appears to be incorrect, what is the right process to report the issue? I.e., ii/6 mentions C++ interface that has been removed AFAIK, and the rest of the text still contains the resp. C++ calls and such. Is this an issue, and if so, who will deal with it? Best regards. Alexander From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:17 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard Here is a version that people can start to look at – as was mentioned, updates are still coming. Rich Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer, Christian Lamprechter Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052 _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

1 0

Re: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard
by Supalov, Alexander 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

Hi Rich, Thanks. Great to see this document come together. Two questions: 1. I suppose we should keep this draft to ourselves for the time being, so I'm asking how strict this should be. I would rather involve some people on my team to review this or a later draft if this is not explicitly disallowed. 2. In case we do find something that appears to be incorrect, what is the right process to report the issue? I.e., ii/6 mentions C++ interface that has been removed AFAIK, and the rest of the text still contains the resp. C++ calls and such. Is this an issue, and if so, who will deal with it? Best regards. Alexander From: mpi-forum-bounces(a)lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:17 PM To: mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: [Mpi-forum] Current Draft standard Here is a version that people can start to look at - as was mentioned, updates are still coming. Rich Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Douglas Lusk, Peter Gleissner, Hannes Schwaderer, Christian Lamprechter Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052

1 0