You are linking to the forks, i.e., not …/petsc/petsc/…, you’ll never see anything going on there, I think.I’ve started the pipelines by clicking “Run Pipeline” here https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/3616/pipelines and there https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/3707/pipelines
Thanks,PierreOn 12 Mar 2021, at 3:02 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com> wrote:On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:29 AM Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com> wrote:On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:24 PM Satish Balay <balay@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:For forks - a member of the developer group needs to start a new pipeline. (after basic checks on the changes)The original pipeline just sat pending in the source check, so I cancelled it.I created a new pipeline, but it is just sitting pending in the source checkWhy will this not run?Same problem for Connor's branch: https://gitlab.com/connorjward/petsc/-/pipelines/269584870MattThanks,MattSatish
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Jed Brown wrote:
> Says the pipeline was canceled. The branch comes from a fork so it should need approval to run.
>
> https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/3707
>
> Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > https://gitlab.com/danfinn/petsc/-/pipelines/269297070
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> > experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
> >
> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>--What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener--What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener