On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 6:50 AM Mark Adams <mfadams@lbl.gov> wrote:
Good idea. 
I have it on my laptop and I have 8 bisection steps to do (the most recent version tag is good, yes!), but the repo seems broken at ea672e62cc. 
I am looking at the code and these vars are in fact not defined. I commented out this block and am pressing on.

However, this looks like a bug. 
You should be able to reproduce this by bisection with main=good and v3.15.1=bad.
First step fails with this:

/Users/markadams/Codes/petsc2/src/dm/dt/fe/impls/basic/febasic.c:1138:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'n0'
      if (n0) {
          ^
/Users/markadams/Codes/petsc2/src/dm/dt/fe/impls/basic/febasic.c:1143:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'n1'
      if (n1) {
          ^
/Users/markadams/Codes/petsc2/src/dm/dt/fe/impls/basic/febasic.c:1148:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'n2'
      if (n2) {
          ^
/Users/markadams/Codes/petsc2/src/dm/dt/fe/impls/basic/febasic.c:1153:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'n3'
      if (n3) {
          ^
4 errors generated.
make[3]: *** [arch-macosx-gnu-g/obj/dm/dt/fe/impls/basic/febasic.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [libs] Error 2
**************************ERROR*************************************
  Error during compile, check arch-macosx-gnu-g/lib/petsc/conf/make.log
  Send it and arch-macosx-gnu-g/lib/petsc/conf/configure.log to petsc-maint@mcs.anl.gov
********************************************************************
make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
(base) 06:32 2 (ea672e62cc...)|BISECTING ~/Codes/petsc2$ rm -fr arch-macosx-gnu-g/

Can you nudge it to the next commit? It looks like I split up the sets incorrectly for the PetscWeakForm change.

   Matt
 
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:14 PM Junchao Zhang <junchao.zhang@gmail.com> wrote:
Mark,
  I am not sure what your problem is.  If it is a regression, can you bisect it?
--Junchao Zhang


On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:04 PM Mark Adams <mfadams@lbl.gov> wrote:
I also tried commenting out the second VecView, so there is just one step in the file, and the .h5 file is only 8 bytes smaller and the .xmf file goes from 5373  bytes to 3090 bytes.

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:01 PM Mark Adams <mfadams@lbl.gov> wrote:
It is not a device issue but it is a regression.

Landau ex1 is tiny and just calls VecView before and after the TSsolve, which is one time step. If you add "-dm_view hdf5:f.h5 -vec_view hdf5:f.h5::append -dm_landau_Ez 10." to landau/ex1 (see below), you get an h5 file with two time steps, as it should be. 
This is a huge electric field, Ez=10, which makes the electron distribution (u_e) get visibly pulled off center. 
In Visit, both time steps have identical data that is clearly after the solve and not the initial condition (see attached). 

I ran this again with -ex1_ts_max_steps 0 and get the expected result of two steps/frames with the symmetric initial condition in both. THis is correct behavior.

Any ideas?
Thanks

diff --git a/src/ts/utils/dmplexlandau/tutorials/ex1.c b/src/ts/utils/dmplexlandau/tutorials/ex1.c
index 9e4c8f1b61..31dfda2fad 100644
--- a/src/ts/utils/dmplexlandau/tutorials/ex1.c
+++ b/src/ts/utils/dmplexlandau/tutorials/ex1.c
@@ -66,6 +66,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
   test:
     suffix: 0
     requires: p4est !complex
-    args: -petscspace_degree 3 -petscspace_poly_tensor 1 -dm_landau_type p4est -dm_landau_ion_masses 2,4 -dm_landau_ion_charges 1,18 -dm_landau_thermal_temps 5,5,.5 -dm_landau_n 1.00018,1,1e-5 -dm_landau_n_0 1e20 -ex1_ts_monitor -ex1_snes_rtol 1.e-14 -ex1_snes_stol 1.e-14 -ex1_snes_monitor -ex1_snes_converged_reason -ex1_ts_type arkimex -ex1_ts_arkimex_type 1bee -ex1_ts_max_snes_failures -1 -ex1_ts_rtol 1e-1 -ex1_ts_dt 1.e-1 -ex1_ts_max_time 1 -ex1_ts_adapt_clip .5,1.25 -ex1_ts_adapt_scale_solve_failed 0.75 -ex1_ts_adapt_time_step_increase_delay 5 -ex1_ts_max_steps 1 -ex1_pc_type lu -ex1_ksp_type preonly -dm_landau_amr_levels_max 7 -dm_landau_domain_radius 5 -dm_landau_amr_re_levels 0 -dm_landau_re_radius 1 -dm_landau_amr_z_refine1 1 -dm_landau_amr_z_refine2 0 -dm_landau_amr_post_refine 0 -dm_landau_z_radius1 .1 -dm_landau_z_radius2 .1 -dm_refine 1 -dm_landau_gpu_assembly false
+    args: -petscspace_degree 3 -petscspace_poly_tensor 1 -dm_landau_type p4est -dm_landau_ion_masses 2,4 -dm_landau_ion_charges 1,18 -dm_landau_thermal_temps 5,5,.5 -dm_landau_n 1.00018,1,1e-5 -dm_landau_n_0 1e20 -ex1_ts_monitor -ex1_snes_rtol 1.e-14 -ex1_snes_stol 1.e-14 -ex1_snes_monitor -ex1_snes_converged_reason -ex1_ts_type arkimex -ex1_ts_arkimex_type 1bee -ex1_ts_max_snes_failures -1 -ex1_ts_rtol 1e-1 -ex1_ts_dt 1.e-1 -ex1_ts_max_time 1 -ex1_ts_adapt_clip .5,1.25 -ex1_ts_adapt_scale_solve_failed 0.75 -ex1_ts_adapt_time_step_increase_delay 5 -ex1_ts_max_steps 1 -ex1_pc_type lu -ex1_ksp_type preonly -dm_landau_amr_levels_max 7 -dm_landau_domain_radius 5 -dm_landau_amr_re_levels 0 -dm_landau_re_radius 1 -dm_landau_amr_z_refine1 1 -dm_landau_amr_z_refine2 0 -dm_landau_amr_post_refine 0 -dm_landau_z_radius1 .1 -dm_landau_z_radius2 .1 -dm_refine 1 -dm_landau_gpu_assembly false -dm_view hdf5:f.h5 -vec_view hdf5:f.h5::append -dm_landau_Ez 10.

 TEST*/

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:38 PM Mark Adams <mfadams@lbl.gov> wrote:
Landau ex1 should work. I will test.

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:47 AM Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:44 AM Junchao Zhang <junchao.zhang@gmail.com> wrote:
Use VecGetArrayRead/Write() to get up-to-date host pointers to the vector array.

I think Mark is saying that those are not working. We do call VecGetArrayRead() in the HDF5 code.

Mark, it seem like a small broken code is necessary.

  Thanks,

    Matt
 
--Junchao Zhang


On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 9:15 AM Mark Adams <mfadams@lbl.gov> wrote:
First, there seem to be two pages for VecGetArrayAndMemType (one has a pointer to the other).

So I need to get a CPU array for HDF5 viewing. Totally broken for devices.

I don't find a VecGetArrayCpu[HOST] that does the right thing. 

Perhaps have VecGetArrayAndMemType return a valid CPU pointer when "mtype==NULL"?

Mark


--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener



--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener