On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Jed Brown
<jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Barry Smith
<bsmith@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
Should I remove all the MPIDense stuff from PETSc now? It is uses PLAPACK which is buggy and unsupported.
That is still a good distribution for MxN matrices with M>>N. We can do them with Elemental, but that would use a different distribution so it will be more complicated to interact with. (The current Elemental interface uses a squarish distribution, but we can tell Elemental to use the [VC,*] distribution (for which fewer operations are supported).
The main thing I care about for that distribution is QR. The best format is dense and row-aligned. I don't care whether it uses MPIDense or a new "multi-vector" thing, but that concept should be somewhere.