On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Jed Brown <jed@jedbrown.org> wrote:
Barry Smith <bsmith@mcs.anl.gov> writes:

>   test:
>     suffix: restart_0
>     requires: hdf5
>     args: -run_type test -refinement_limit 0.0    -bc_type dirichlet -interpolate 1 -petscspace_order 1 -dm_view hdf5:sol.h5 -vec_view hdf5:sol.h5::append
>
>   test:
>     suffix: restart_1
>     requires: hdf5
>     args: -run_type test -refinement_limit 0.0    -bc_type dirichlet -interpolate 1 -petscspace_order 1 -f sol.h5 -restart
>
> See a problem?
>
> Should the same run of the example view the files and then load them back in? versus trying to read in a data file from another run that may not even have been created before and even if it was, the file was definitely created  in a different directory?

So if write only is broken, do you want both to fail?  I think it's
better to read and write separately, with comparison using h5diff, since
that independently tests read vs write and establishes backward
compatibility, which you'd really like the test system to make you deal
with explicitly.

I know the test is broken, but I did already mail the list about this and was waiting for an answer
to be worked out.

I agree with Satish that running two commands would be great. I could rewrite the example to
both write and load it, but it would complicate it. Also, I am trying to get the pattern I expect the
user to follow for checkpointing.

   Matt

--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener