On 7/25/06, Satish Balay <balay@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Barry Smith wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Satish Balay wrote:
>
> > Yes - not having file comments makes it more difficult to go back in
> > file history.
> >
> > But one way to look at it is - for some of these senarios - it meanas
> > multiple changesets should be created [with the correct grouping of
> > changes] instead of the atempted single changeset.
>
>    Yes, the problem with this is that there is no decent way of
> making multiple change-sets.

- quit emacs without typing in any comments  [so no commit is done]
- 'hg status' to get the list of modified files
- hg commit file1 file2 [ to make the appropriate changeset]

I use 'hg ct' though..

> If I could just edit out the files
> I did not want when doing the comment for a commit it would make
> life a MILLION times better (could that be added?).

I'll check on this on the mercurial list..

Satish

>
>    Barry
>
> >
> > And perhaps some comments can actually go into the code.
> >
> > Satish
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Barry Smith wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >   Not having file by file comments for changesets is
> > > starting to annoy me.
> > >
> > >    Barry
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>