Jose, Looks ok to me for you to push for 3.3 and dev. Barry On Jul 20, 2012, at 4:20 AM, Jose E. Roman wrote:

El 18/07/2012, a las 17:45, Jed Brown escribió:

...

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jose E. Roman <[email protected]> wrote: El 18/07/2012, a las 15:05, Jed Brown escribió:

...

MatMultHermitianTranspose could have a default implementation in terms of the others. Then it would work in all cases, right?

Do you mean VecConjugate(x) plus MatMultTranspose(A,x,y) plus VecConjugate(y) ?? I guess this would work.

In the PETSc implementation, right?

How about the attached patch? If you agree, should I push to petsc-3.3? or petsc-dev only?

Jose

<patch-hermitian-transpose>