Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc blame digest (next) 2016-06-24
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Dave May wrote:
On Friday, 24 June 2016, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote:
for (p=0; p<n_bbox_recv; p++) { printf("[rank %d]: box from %d : range[%+1.4e,%+1.4e]x[%+1.4e,%+1.4e]\n",rank,recv_bbox[p].owner_rank,
recv_bbox[p].min[0],recv_bbox[p].max[0],recv_bbox[p].min[1],recv_bbox[p].max[1]); }
Is this printf for debugging purposes - and perhaps should be removed?
Yeah - absolutely.
I've been moving house(s) the last days and have been unable to clean up all the annoying business like this. Matt unexpectedly / abruptly merged my stuff without warning me :D
I'll take care of it tonight.
This branch is merged into 'knepley/feature-plex-particle-example' - and some of the fixes are in this branch [bad fix workflow] - so you should first check here if some issue is fixes or not. Satish
participants (1)
-
Satish Balay