Re: using MUMPS with mg
On 6/23/08, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
It will be gone.
Ups! Was this decided in some private discussion? I remember the post were you proposed this; I also remember there were some objections, but you started it anyway, so I guessed that this was already accepted. IMHO, the whole idea was +1 for me (though I did not commented on this). Did you change your mind? Was this rejected for the other developers in the PETSc team? Was a better mechanism devised? -- Lisandro Dalc�n --------------- Centro Internacional de M�todos Computacionales en Ingenier�a (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol�gico para la Industria Qu�mica (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient�ficas y T�cnicas (CONICET) PTLC - G�emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
participants (1)
-
Lisandro Dalcin