Re: [petsc-dev] Jed didn't like the directory private but he has no problem with finclude?
29 Mar
2012
29 Mar
'12
9:19 p.m.
Since AR Jed felt we should change the name of include/private (and I agree it was appropriate) shouldn't we also change the name of include/finclude? It has the same problem of pollution when dumped in a --prefix location.
Should it be petsc-fortran? Or petsc-fortran-include?
You can call PETSc from fortran? How quaint! How about include/petsc-quaint?
5247
Age (days ago)
5247
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Sean Farley