Re: [petsc-dev] Tag name v3.15
Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the: MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards compatible manner, and PATCH version when you make backwards compatible bug fixes. <<<< For one - we don't strictly use semantic versions. - Our PATCH versions have (some) new functionality [from above that should be MINOR] - Our MINOR versions have lot more new functionality, with some incompatible API changes [this should be MAJOR - but we haven't changed that in a while] Wrt v3.15.0 vs v3.15 I don't remember the exact reason. I suspect we just stuck with this notation for a long time [and didn't want to change it] Also Barry still wants to use 'release' term only with v3.15 - and 3.15.1 etc as updates [but not releases] Satish On Wed, 31 Mar 2021, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
Satish, if we use semantic versioning for the PETSc version itself and the tarball, why don't we use the same format for tags? In short, why aren't we using v3.15.0 instead of v3.15 ?
participants (1)
-
Satish Balay