Re: [petsc-dev] Parallel Gauss - Seidel
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Mark F. Adams <[email protected]>wrote:
1) I need a G-S kernel that takes an IS of indices to process and a flag to process them in forward or reverse order. How should I proceed to do this. Should I just clone sor?
You are going to have several of these index sets? You could have a PCSORSetIS(). Probably need to add a MatOp for MatSORIS(). Barry might have other ideas.
2) I don't want to use Richardson iterations for G-S. Should I make a G-S KPS method? I don't want to take a residual in the iterator (KSP) and if symmetric G-S is requested then it should drive this I think.
Look at PCApplyRichardson_SOR().
SOR does two sweeps in each application; I'm not wild about that because a good way to run G-S in a V(1,1) cycle is to do a forward sweep in pre smoothing and a backward sweep in post smoothing.
Well, MatSOR() has this flag MatSORType that can specify forward and reverse. You have one PC for the down-smoother and another for the up-smoother, then configure one to be a forward sweep and the other to be reverse.
participants (1)
-
Jed Brown