Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes:

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Jed Brown wrote:

...

Bitbucket keeps saying "Something went wrong while creating your pull request." but you can look at the branch

https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/jed/mpiuni-include/maint

@balay Can we simply remove the MPIUNI includes from MPI.py or should we remove it later?

Best to remove now - to check if there are issues?

also Fix mpif.h usage code?

There is also mpi.mod - that might need renaming [to comply with not installing in /usr/include?]

So rename to mpiuni.mod? [and rename mpi.h to mpiuni.h etc?]

Renaming to include/petsc/mpiuni.h and the module probably makes sense because ensuring correct path ordering is really delicate.

Looks like this change is more of a 'master change'..

This branch started from 'maint', but does not need to be merged there.

...

What --download packages are supported when using MPIUNI? I don't see any examples.

Yeah - our tests are basic here. I don't remember if any externalpackages compiled with mpiuni

Satish