Re: [petsc-dev] configure issues
9 Feb
2011
9 Feb
'11
4:45 a.m.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:33, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:
A single system, with real scoping, easy debugging, more readable code, etc.
Would you like a pony? What does this even mean? There is logic for a PETSc program to attach a debugger to itself. The details of that logic depends on tests that are run by configure. PETSc does not presently require Python at runtime. If you were to refactor it, where would the logic go and how would it be called from C?
5662
Age (days ago)
5662
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jed Brown