Thanks for the quick response. A related question is are examples in the tutorials tested before the release or only the examples in tests? Travis =============================== Travis Austin, Ph.D VP, Computational Mathematics Tech-X Corporation 5621 Arapahoe Ave Boulder, CO 80303 [email protected] =============================== On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Travis Austin <[email protected]> wrote: Hi,

I have been digging into the tutorials directories in PETSc and wanting to understand how the makefile breaks up fortran examples into TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN and TESTEXAMPLES_F90. (This is follow on work from the Tech-X Phase I related to PETSc.)

There appear to be some F90 examples that are mixed in TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN. For example, in the snes tutorials, I see this:

snes/examples/tutorials/makefile:TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN = ex1f.PETSc runex1f ex1f.rm ex40f90.PETSc runex40f90 ex40f90.rm

Its a mistake.

In other places, anything with an f90 in the name is under TESTEXAMPLES_F90.

Is there any particular strategy for how files are placed under TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN and TESTEXAMPLES_F90?

Another related question is that some of the F90 examples have a .F suffix and others have a .F90 suffix which is of course related to formatting but my guess is the committer of these files just following their own preferences. (See snes/examples/tutorials/ex39f90.F and ex40f90.F90.)

F90 is wrong, another mistake.

Matt

Does anyone know if there was a reason that ex39f90 was made *.F and ex40f90 was make *.F90? I'm trying to parse some of these examples based on suffixes and different suffixes makes is a bit more cumbersome.

Thanks for any help, Travis

=============================== Travis Austin, Ph.D VP, Computational Mathematics Tech-X Corporation 5621 Arapahoe Ave Boulder, CO 80303 [email protected] ===============================

-- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener