Simon Burton <[email protected]> writes:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:57:02 -0500 Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:

...

...

(d) m=exp(m) (pointwise exp)

We could add pointwise operations just like the VecPointwise*().

Matt

Yes, we need MatPointwiseMult aswell.

Should I make a start on this ?

I am thinking more about what Barry said. The VecPointwise*() operations can be given a solid mathematical interpretation in terms of spinor operations. However, I do not see anything like that for the Mat stuff yet. We need to understand the mathematicas better. Matt -- "Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir Alec Guiness