Interesting paper. I'll read it and get back to you on "How does this compare to petsc MatMatMult(). Hong On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:

to the new scalable MatMatMult() that is done in PETSc? Is it possible to even compare the flop rates sensibly?

http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.1692

This is what Jeff is planning on using in his SciDAC.

Matt

-- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener