On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

...

On Feb 8, 2013, at 11:04 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:

...

There are some broken examples in SNES that I would like to clean up in preparation for real output checking there. They are

ex5: I think we just overwrite the solutions with the current stuff

ex22 and ex58: Barry this look like you, and the results are really different

The new values are no less valid than the old so just overwrite the old outputs.

Okay, pushed.

The ex5 output changed here, for a justifiable reason, though the code got much messier to implement this change. https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/commits/4c6428f5d4f1623dc2ea08f9e0be16... Tests output needs to be updated when an intentional change like this is made. I didn't bisect for ex22 or ex58, but perhaps it's a similar issue.

Next step, insert Python validator for output, possibly with more structure.

What's your plan for implementing this?