Hi Matt, Merry Christmas! I was wondering if you had a chance to put in the Fortran interfaces? No worries if you haven’t. We’re breaking up from work on Tuesday and won’t be back until the 7th of Jan so I won’t be working on it for a couple of weeks. It would be great to be able to get back to working on out Petsc code once we’re back though. Is there anyway I can tell that I need to pull a new dev version or should I just wait for you to email me? Anyway I hope you have a good break and its not too freezing where you are. We’ll be heading to the beach down here. Cheers John -- Dr John O'Sullivan Lecturer Department of Engineering Science University of Auckland, New Zealand email: jp.osullivan at auckland.ac.nz<https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/petsc-dev> tel: +64 (0)9 923 85353 From: Matthew Knepley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, 14 December 2014 4:52 p.m. To: John O'Sullivan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] More Fortran Interfaces On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:00 AM, John O'Sullivan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I'm working with Adrian on our PetSc project at the University of Auckland. I think I've found a couple more fortran interfaces that are missing: DMPlexGetFaceFields DMPlexGefFaceGeometry I get the error: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "_dmplexgetfacefields_", referenced from: _rhs_darcy_local.2542 in darcy.o "_dmplexgetfacegeometry_", referenced from: _rhs_darcy_local.2542 in darcy.o I haven't got to the restore stage yet but I think probably these ones are missing too: DMPlexRestoreFaceFields DMPlexRestoreFaceGeometry Also I'm having trouble declaring a pointer to a PetscFVFaceGeom type to use with the DMPlexGetFaceGeometry. Is there a trick to this or maybe its definition in fortran is missing too? Sorry, this is a really bad time of year for me with family and work travel. I can put in the Fortran bindings this week I think. I do not know how to handle structs in Fortran (will ask Fortran gurus). Right now, I am just going to make a PetscScalar array with one more dimension since the struct is a bunch of Scalars, and you will have to index into it treating the struct as another dim. Thanks, Matt Thanks very much! Cheers John -- Dr John O'Sullivan Lecturer Department of Engineering Science University of Auckland, New Zealand email: jp.osullivan at auckland.ac.nz<https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/petsc-dev> tel: +64 (0)9 923 85353 -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener