Thanks for the clarification.However, would it be more consistent to differentiate between 0D (vertex sets), 1D (edge sets), 2d (faces) and 3D (cell sets)?If I want to now apply boundary condition on a face with tag 1, it would contain the 4 edges making up that face and an additional edge with the same physical tag?Basically, I can’t differentiate between the two entities
Thanks,SharanGroup - Theory & SimulationDepartment of Microstructure Physics & Alloy DesignFrom: Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com>
To: Sharan Roongta <s.roongta@mpie.de>
Cc: "petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov" <petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>
Sent: 13/12/2023 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] difference in Face Sets in latest petsc releaseOn Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:50 PM Sharan Roongta <s.roongta@mpie.de> wrote:Hello,I see discrepancy in the size/value of the 'Face Sets' printed in the current release v3.20.2 , and v3.18.6
Attached is the .msh file
-dm_view with v3.18.6DM Object: Generated Mesh 1 MPI processtype: plexGenerated Mesh in 3 dimensions:Number of 0-cells per rank: 14Number of 1-cells per rank: 49Number of 2-cells per rank: 60Number of 3-cells per rank: 24Labels:celltype: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 6 (24), 3 (60), 1 (49))depth: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 1 (49), 2 (60), 3 (24))Cell Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (24))Face Sets: 5 strata with value/size (1 (4), 2 (4), 3 (4), 4 (4), 5 (4))
-dm_view with the current release (commit 4b9a870af96)DM Object: Generated Mesh 1 MPI processtype: plexGenerated Mesh in 3 dimensions:Number of 0-cells per rank: 14Number of 1-cells per rank: 49Number of 2-cells per rank: 60Number of 3-cells per rank: 24Labels:celltype: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 6 (24), 3 (60), 1 (49))depth: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 1 (49), 2 (60), 3 (24))Cell Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (24))Face Sets: 12 strata with value/size (1 (5), 2 (5), 3 (5), 4 (5), 5 (5), 6 (1), 7 (1), 8 (1), 9 (1), 10 (1), 11 (1), 12 (1))
I believe the older version printed the correct thing? Has something changed in the interpretation of Face Sets?Yes. In the older version, I was only labeling cells, faces, and vertices. There were complaints, so I put in the edge labels. If you check, all the additional labels are on edges, and checking your .msh file, those edges clearly have those labels.Thanks,MattThanks,
SharanGroup - Theory & SimulationDepartment of Microstructure Physics & Alloy Design
-------------------------------------------------
Stay up to date and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.
Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
Max-Planck-Straße 1
D-40237 Düsseldorf
Handelsregister B 2533
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
Geschäftsführung
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dehm
Prof. Dr. Jörg Neugebauer
Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe
Dr. Kai de Weldige
Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE 11 93 58 514
Steuernummer: 105 5891 1000
Please consider that invitations and e-mails of our institute are
only valid if they end with …@mpie.de.
If you are not sure of the validity please contact rco@mpie.de
Bitte beachten Sie, dass Einladungen zu Veranstaltungen und E-Mails
aus unserem Haus nur mit der Endung …@mpie.de gültig sind.
In Zweifelsfällen wenden Sie sich bitte an rco@mpie.de
-------------------------------------------------
--What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------------------------------------------
Stay up to date and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.
Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
Max-Planck-Straße 1
D-40237 Düsseldorf
Handelsregister B 2533
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
Geschäftsführung
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dehm
Prof. Dr. Jörg Neugebauer
Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe
Dr. Kai de Weldige
Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE 11 93 58 514
Steuernummer: 105 5891 1000
Please consider that invitations and e-mails of our institute are
only valid if they end with …@mpie.de.
If you are not sure of the validity please contact rco@mpie.de
Bitte beachten Sie, dass Einladungen zu Veranstaltungen und E-Mails
aus unserem Haus nur mit der Endung …@mpie.de gültig sind.
In Zweifelsfällen wenden Sie sich bitte an rco@mpie.de
-------------------------------------------------