Dear all,
I am trying to optimize the nonlinear solvers in a code of
mine, but I am having a hard time at interpreting the profiling
data from the SNES. In particular, if I run with -snesCorr_snes_lag_jacobian
5 -snesCorr_snes_linesearch_monitor -snesCorr_snes_monitor
-snesCorr_snes_linesearch_type basic -snesCorr_snes_view I
get, for all timesteps an output like
0 SNES
Function norm 2.204257292307e+00
1 SNES Function norm 5.156376709750e-03
2 SNES Function norm 9.399026338316e-05
3 SNES Function norm 1.700505246874e-06
4 SNES Function norm 2.938127043559e-08
SNES Object: snesCorr (snesCorr_) 1 MPI process
type: newtonls
maximum iterations=50, maximum function evaluations=10000
tolerances: relative=1e-08, absolute=1e-50, solution=1e-08
total number of linear solver iterations=4
total number of function evaluations=5
norm schedule ALWAYS
Jacobian is rebuilt every 5 SNES iterations
SNESLineSearch Object: (snesCorr_) 1 MPI process
type: basic
maxstep=1.000000e+08, minlambda=1.000000e-12
tolerances: relative=1.000000e-08, absolute=1.000000e-15,
lambda=1.000000e-08
maximum iterations=40
KSP Object: (snesCorr_) 1 MPI process
type: gmres
restart=30, using Classical (unmodified) Gram-Schmidt
Orthogonalization with no iterative refinement
happy breakdown tolerance 1e-30
maximum iterations=10000, initial guess is zero
tolerances: relative=1e-05, absolute=1e-50,
divergence=10000.
left preconditioning
using PRECONDITIONED norm type for convergence test
PC Object: (snesCorr_) 1 MPI process
type: ilu
out-of-place factorization
0 levels of fill
tolerance for zero pivot 2.22045e-14
matrix ordering: natural
factor fill ratio given 1., needed 1.
Factored matrix follows:
Mat Object: (snesCorr_) 1 MPI process
type: seqaij
rows=1200, cols=1200
package used to perform factorization: petsc
total: nonzeros=17946, allocated nonzeros=17946
using I-node routines: found 400 nodes, limit used
is 5
linear system matrix = precond matrix:
Mat Object: 1 MPI process
type: seqaij
rows=1200, cols=1200
total: nonzeros=17946, allocated nonzeros=17946
total number of mallocs used during MatSetValues calls=0
using I-node routines: found 400 nodes, limit used is 5
I guess that this means that no linesearch is performed and the
full Newton step is always performed (I did not report the full
output, but all timesteps are alike). Also, with the default (bt)
LineSearch, the total CPU time does not change, which seems in
line with this.
However, I'd have expected that the time spent in SNESLineSearch
would be negligible, but the flamegraph is showing that about 38%
of the time spent by SNESSolve is actually spent in
SNESLineSearch. Furthermore, SNESLineSearch seems to cause more
SNESFunction evaluations (in terms of CPU time) than the SNESSolve
itself. The flamegraph is attached.
Could some expert help me in understanding these data? Is the
LineSearch actually performing the newton step? Given that the
full step is always taken, can the SNESFunction evaluations from
the LineSearch be skipped?
Thanks a lot!
Matteo