Thanks a lot, Jed and Aron.
Do you have ideas for this problem?
But I encounter a new problem, the situation is:
1, the matrix is big, and can be partitioned to several blocks;
2, started several threads to handle each block of matrix;
3, integrated all block matrices together.
Again, the program crashed with reporting:
My libpetsc.a is built with option
Will it support this type of multiple threads?
Thanks,
From: petsc-users-bounces@mcs.anl.gov
[mailto:petsc-users-bounces@mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of
Jed Brown
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 9:26 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] PETSC ERROR: Caught signal number 15 Terminate
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 04:00,
1, I put
2, the problem ran in server side will send SIGTERM to kill all of clients after one stage is done.
3, then, unfortunately, the signal
You can remove the order dependence by running with -no_signal_handler or setting your own signal handler with: