On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Jed Brown <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov">jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><br></div><div>Are _all_ the processes making it here?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sigh.  I knew someone was going to ask that ;-)</div><div><br>
</div><div>I&#39;ll have to write a short script to grab the stack trace from every one of the 10,000 processes to see where they are and try to find any anomalies.   Anyone have a script (or pieces of one) to do this that they wouldn&#39;t mind sharing?</div>
<div><br></div><div>I did spot check quite a few and they were all in the same spot.</div><div><br></div><div>Now here comes the weirdness: I left one of these processes attached in GDB for quite a while (10+ minutes) after the whole job had been hung for over an hour.  When I noticed that I had left it attached I detached GDB and.... the job started right up!  That is: it moved on past this problem!  How is that for some weirdness.  It might have just been coincidence... or maybe me stalling that process for a bit by attaching GDB nudged some communication in the right direction... I don&#39;t know.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I know that&#39;s not terribly scientific.  I&#39;ll have to wait until the next job hangs before I can do more inspection, but when (not if) that happens I&#39;ll post back with more info.</div><div><br>
</div><div>Derek</div></div>