hi Thank you for your insights. I am still wondering, why the busy wait is in the MPI_Barrier. As the purpose of the Barrier is to just wait for all involved processes. I think the latentency introduced with one or another way of saving energy is not such important in the Barrier. For all other communication it might be best to perform a short busy wait in order to guarantee a maximum message rate. Was it considered before to introduce an "energy aware wait" for the MPI_Barrier function? So that the user can still enjoy the high performance solution for all other communication. Regards Tim Jammer Am 29.09.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Rob Latham:
Your proposal introduces latency. Data centers want power efficiency, but several large classes of applications care about message rate.
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss