On 10/01/2015 12:35 PM, Ignacio Laguna wrote:
Once you have a version I can download with the patches, I can run the analysis again and see if I can catch more things. Just let me know and I would be happy to test it.
I tried to decipher the LLVM output: I see a few more i64 values, but not certain I'm reading it correctly. Does this patch do the trick? Promoting the declaration of recvcount would work too, but sets off a larger cascade of type promotions. ==rob
In general, overflows can also occur in intermediate computations, depending on how code is optimized, I believe.
Thanks!
Ignacio
==rob
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Lab, IL USA