I thought I responded to this email (it’s in my sent folder), but it never showed up on the mailing list. Here it is again: Hello, Yes, you can use the info argument “hosts” to specify nodes that are not a part of the original PBS job. — Pavan On 2/20/14, 4:36 PM, "Suraj Prabhakaran" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Thats an extension we have made. We hope to release it soon!
Best, Suraj
On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:42 PM, Reuti wrote:
Hi,
Am 20.02.2014 um 18:10 schrieb Suraj Prabhakaran:
I want use MPICH under the Torque RMS. I can see that mpiexec will automatically take the nodefile from $PBS_NODEFILE. I am working on dynamically adding nodes to an existing job in torque. So there might be a point where the job actually has more number of nodes than what was listed in $PBS_NODEFILE.
How do you tell Torque that it should increase the number of granted slots/nodes for a particular already running job?
-- Reuti
Is it possible to do an MPI_Comm_spawn on these new nodes (which is not listed in PBS_NODEFILE but is actually a part of job)? For example using some info argument such as add-host or something? Or if it entails that the PBS_NODEFILE must be changed with the newly added nodes, I can do that too. But the basic question is, can MPICH spawn processes on these newly allocated nodes for the same job through some mechanism?
Best, Suraj _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss