On 01/12/2016 11:17 AM, Eric Chamberland wrote:
Otherwise, we would have to implement all of
MPI_Get_address(x,y) MPI_File_write_at(a,b,c,d,e,f) MPI_File_read_at_all(a,b,c,d,e,f) MPI_File_write_all_begin(a,b,c,d) MPI_File_write_all_end(a,b,c) MPI_File_write(a,b,c,d,e) MPI_File_read_all_begin(a,b,c,d) MPI_File_read_all_end(a,b,c) MPI_FILE_delete MPI_Info_set MPI_Info_free MPI_Info_create
yep, those all look like routines MS-MPI and Intel MPI would support. nothing unusual there.
to work in sequential, which is feasible too...
I don't know what the consistency semantics of SMB/CFS are: when are writes from one client visible to another?
Can't tell... when I used windows for the last time I was so younger! :)
as this list is for mpich, and mpich no longer has window support, I'll have to encourage you to contact MS-MPI or Intel MPI folks for follow up questions. ==rob
Thanks for the answer!
Eric
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss