I'm unfamiliar with the xl suite -- don't they have xlf that handles .f, .f90, and .F90 source files? On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Pavan Balaji <[email protected]> wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <[email protected]> wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Jeff Hammond <[email protected]> wrote:
It is important to separate out the F77 wrapper from the F90+ one to support the case where the F77 compiler cannot handle F90+ code and vice versa. The IBM compiler is this way because of fixed/free source form handling.
I'm not sure I understand this -- my understanding is that compilers differentiate between the different forms of Fortran (fixed vs. free) via the .suffix.
This is very much in line with compilers like ifort, pgifort, etc.
xl is in a league of it’s own. :-)
Maybe they’ll fix it in future versions. But we can’t abandon it if that’s the way it is right now. Many users still use those compilers.
— Pavan
-- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/