Here's the implementation status slide: http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/mpi31-impl-status-Nov15.pdf -- Pavan
On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Jeff Hammond <[email protected]> wrote:
I recall from the most recent slide deck reporting on the status of MPI implementations (I think Pavan posted it on the MPI Forum list around SC15 timeframe) that Blue Gene/Q MPI has a no-op MPI_T implementation, which is to say, they expose zero pvars.
Jeff
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Daniel Ibanez <[email protected]> wrote: Hello,
I just learned about the performance variable interface and was hoping to try it out. However, I've tried a recent MPICH build from source on a workstation and the older MPI install on our IBM BlueGene/Q, both of which show zero performance variables. In particular,
MPI_T_pvar_get_num
returns zero. Is there something I need to do to get this working or should I turn to a different source to get such performance information ?
Many Thanks,
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- Jeff Hammond [email protected] http://jeffhammond.github.io/ _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss