Re: [mpich-discuss] Failed to allocate memory for an unexpected message
16 Jan
2014
16 Jan
'14
12:11 p.m.
On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Luiz Carlos da Costa Junior <[email protected]> wrote:
However, I noticed that the execution times were much higher than the cases in which the failure didn't occur. Is there any reason, apart from some implementation mistake, to explain this behavior?
What are the two cases you are comparing? Are you against comparing process failures? — Pavan
4569
Age (days ago)
4569
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Balaji, Pavan