Re: [mpich-discuss] Failed to allocate memory for an unexpected message
No, these failures don't occur all the time. I have a successful run (with my original implementation) which I am using as the base case for comparison. On 16 January 2014 16:11, Balaji, Pavan <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Luiz Carlos da Costa Junior < [email protected]> wrote:
However, I noticed that the execution times were much higher than the cases in which the failure didn't occur. Is there any reason, apart from some implementation mistake, to explain this behavior?
What are the two cases you are comparing? Are you against comparing process failures?
— Pavan _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
participants (1)
-
Luiz Carlos da Costa Junior