Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Comm_idup hang with multiple nodes
Hi Daniel, Thanks for reporting the bug. I can reproduce it on my desktop. I will work on a fix. You can track the progress here. http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/2269 -- Huiwei Lu Postdoc Appointee Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~huiweilu/ On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Daniel Pou <[email protected]> wrote:
Starting with the test comm_idup_mul.c, and increasing the value of NUM_ITER 10, I am seeing a fairly regular hang with a build from latest master (commit 25204 5/31).
I am running with 2 ranks (1 per node) from SLURM (v2.6.5). I was able to see the behavior with
srun -N 2 -n 2 ./comm_idup_mul (linking against SLURM PMI) and
salloc -N 2 -n 2 mpiexec ./comm_idup_mul.
I witnessed this with both the MXM and TCP netmods. I don't see any issues on single node runs.
Thank you, -Dan
For reference: Modified code from http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/1935
/* -*- Mode: C; c-basic-offset:4 ; indent-tabs-mode:nil ; -*- */ /* * * (C) 2012 by Argonne National Laboratory. * * See COPYRIGHT in top-level directory. * */
/* * * Test creating multiple communicators with MPI_Comm_idup. * */
#include <stdio.h> #include <mpi.h>
#define NUM_ITER 10
int main(int argc, char **argv) { int i, rank; MPI_Comm comms[NUM_ITER]; MPI_Request req[NUM_ITER];
MPI_Init(&argc, &argv); MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
for (i = 0; i < NUM_ITER; i++) MPI_Comm_idup(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &comms[i], &req[i]);
MPI_Waitall(NUM_ITER, req, MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE);
for (i = 0; i < NUM_ITER; i++) MPI_Comm_free(&comms[i]);
if (rank == 0) printf(" No Errors\n");
MPI_Finalize();
return 0; }
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
participants (1)
-
Huiwei Lu