Hi Tim, If you are able to provide the new urls to the git repos before the transition I see no problem with the transition. On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Tim Tautges <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all, Would anybody have a problem with taking the MOAB repo over to BitBucket next week? From what I've surmised from the various documents out there and talking to the PETSc folks, that seems to be the better way to do things. It also would eliminate the need to have one repo shadowing the other for a time, which would be complicated.
Let me know what you think. I'm using BitBucket now for a number of other subprojects, and so far I like the experience, even though I'd call myself still a newbie on git.
- tim
-- ==============================**==============================**==== "You will keep in perfect peace him whose mind is steadfast, because he trusts in you." Isaiah 26:3
Tim Tautges Argonne National Laboratory ([email protected]) (telecommuting from UW-Madison) phone (gvoice): (608) 354-1459 1500 Engineering Dr. fax: (608) 263-4499 Madison, WI 53706
-- Robert Maynard