25 Oct
2009
25 Oct
'09
2:46 p.m.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:59:43PM -0500, Pavan Balaji wrote:
I'd like to initiate a discussion to see what people's thoughts are on requiring "C89++" support from the compiler for MPICH2. ...
If there are other C99 features that would be useful, please point them out as well.
What about the "named member" syntax for structs? I might have the terminology wrong...the syntax where you can explicitly initialize each member of the struct. I know if I modify a struct by adding new members to the end I avoid a lot of headaches. I also know I've neglected to do this at least once :> ==rob -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Lab, IL USA