I talked to Ken and it looks like this should work now. He actually put the right magic into place before I talked to him, but it was after your re-commit. If anyone commits today, just double-check that you get an email for it in case it isn't actually working again. -Dave On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Jayesh Krishna wrote:
I haven't received an email (mpi-all-commits) confirming my commit (re-commit) - r4970 (~ 1/2 hr back) .
Regards, Jayesh
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Dave Goodell Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mpich2-core] spotty SVN history
Ken thinks he has fixed this and my spot checks all look good so far, but keep your eyes open for a little while when dealing with SVN. Also, we had to blow away Jayesh's commit r4970 in the process, so he's going to re-commit it. Don't be surprised by the "double" commit.
-Dave
On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Dave Goodell wrote:
Watch your SVN interactions today very carefully. Systems has upgraded the SVN server (and trac) to new versions, but they seem to have lost and/or mangled some history in the process.
For example, I committed r4954 against trunk at 2009-07-13 15:26:57 and it doesn't appear correctly in the svn history anymore. Instead it ends up showing me change a commit by Kumud (r4907) on the "kumudb" dev branch. At least, it shows me the log message for that commit. It doesn't have any diff for the whole repository for that change. If you try to view the same changeset from the trac website [1] it shows you the right message, but it again thinks that no files or properties changed. I know this change was originally recorded correctly because I have a commit email that shows the property change occurring.
Ken is still out at lunch, but I'm planning to follow up with him about this once he returns. In the mean time, I should be able to answer revision history questions accurately from my local git-svn repository as long as you don't need to know about any property changes (including svn:externals). Feel free to ask if you want to double-check an svn query.
-Dave