Hi Markus, I don't know why this wouldn't work for nelgt > nelgv. I would say we don't know the performance hit yet - I think someone is looking into this question. Performance will of course vary significantly from problem to problem and platform to platform. I suspect that it should not be a major hit --- have you observed otherwise? Paul On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Aleks,
thanks for the code, I looked over it and have two questions: -at some point, it is mentioned that this method does not work if nelgt>nelgv. Why is that? I am asking because this will be applied to a conjugate HT problem (although the recycling part is purely concerning flow+convection). Will this problem also occur when only findpts is used instead of intpts? -is there a performance difference between calling intpts as opposed to gs_op (as is done in the turbJet example) every time step for large scale production runs? The latter is what I used in my version.
Thanks, Markus
[email protected] wrote:
Hi Michael and Markus,
Here is a test case for an unsteady pipe flow with Michael's GambitPipe.rea file which sets inlet Recycling BCs based on interpolation from a cross-section downstream that you specify by a multiple of the inlet normal:
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~obabko/z4.tgz
Let me know if you have any questions. Best, Aleks
----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 5:06:48 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [Nek5000-users] New Recycling BC method?
No worries, just checkin in to see how it was going, thanks for the update! Look forward to trying it out!
- Michael _______________________________________________ Nek5000-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
_______________________________________________ Nek5000-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users