On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Smith, Barry F. wrote:
It would be good to figure out exactly where the difference comes form [wrt chaco from trilinos vs separate install of chaco - or some other interaction from trilinos]
Different random numbers being generated?
Its trilinos vs non-trilinos build of packages - so I don't think its 'different random number generation' issue. Trilinos install does: if self.libraries.check(self.dlib, "interface"): self.addDefine('HAVE_CHACO',1) self.addDefine('HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT',1) if self.libraries.check(self.dlib, "ML_Set_PrintLevel"): self.addDefine('HAVE_ML',1) if self.libraries.check(self.dlib, "Zoltan_LB_Partition"): self.addDefine('HAVE_ZOLTAN',1) if self.libraries.check(self.dlib, "ex_close"): self.addDefine('HAVE_EXODUSII',1) For one there is different chaco code in petsc based on this flag HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT. Its not clear to me if this is causing the difference. --download-chaco is using 'Chaco-2.2-p2.tar.gz'. This matches the latest chaco tarball from their website [Chaco-2.2.tar.gz]. So I do not know if chaco packaged by trilinos has changes that cause this difference [clearly it added some change that resulted in us using the flag HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT] And then there is also exodus.. --download-exodus uses the latest snapshot from https://github.com/gsjaardema/seacas/ Satish