24 Dec
2014
24 Dec
'14
12:22 p.m.
Jose E. Roman writes:
El 23/12/2014, a las 20:38, Sean Farley escribió:
4) Better coordination with dependent packages
This item is hard to implement because it's out of the PETSc team's control. For example, packages like SLEPc depend on PETSc but don't have as good of a build system. SLEPc can't be built with a version of SLEPc already installed in the prefix. This is unnecessarily cumbersome for end-users.
SLEPc issues a warning in this case, but does not prevent building. I have removed the warning, since it is no longer necessary. Please report any problems.
Ah, great! Thanks!